EDOG vs. ENFR
EDOG (ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOG is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDOG returned 5.60%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for ENFR. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EDOG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
EDOG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 27.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EDOG has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 5.60%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
EDOG
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.44%
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.37K | $47.05K | $56.13K | |
| $5.48M | $4.07M | $3.20M |
EDOG vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 5.43% | 22.59% | 1.70% | 11.58% | -10.50% | 11.71% | 7.99% | 13.26% | -16.52% | 20.42% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.46% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOG and ENFR is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.42 |
The correlation between EDOG and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOG vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
EDOG
ENFR
EDOG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 3.28 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 8.01 | -4.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -68.28% | +23.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -8.64% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -15.58% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.54% | -20.29% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | -62.64% | +18.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -3.18% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -15.82% | +4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 3.53% | +1.38% |
Volatility
EDOG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is 3.19%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that EDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 5.48% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 12.31% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 15.26% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 19.20% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 24.65% | -7.29% |
EDOG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than ENFR's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 4.88% | 4.50% | 6.55% | 6.53% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 2.60% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 4.55% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.94% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOG and ENFR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to EDOG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.73% vs 5.60% for EDOG. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EDOG.
EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 3.94% for ENFR.
EDOG is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOG and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer