PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 22.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed SMLV with an annualized return of 8.40%, while SMLV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.79%
6M
6.50%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
8.40%
ALL TIME*
3.21%

SMLV

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.61%
6M
15.91%
YTD
22.24%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.11%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
22.24%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and SMLV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.46

EDIV vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDIV
SMLV

Financial Services

30.3%
30.9%

Communication Services

14.0%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

13.2%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
9.0%

Technology

9.7%
11.8%

Industrials

9.2%
14.3%

Real Estate

3.3%
11.9%

Energy

3.2%
1.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.5%
3.3%

Healthcare

1.4%
8.9%

Financial Services

EDIV
30.3%
SMLV
30.9%

Communication Services

EDIV
14.0%
SMLV
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

EDIV
13.2%
SMLV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EDIV
11.9%
SMLV
9.0%

Technology

EDIV
9.7%
SMLV
11.8%

Industrials

EDIV
9.2%
SMLV
14.3%

Real Estate

EDIV
3.3%
SMLV
11.9%

Energy

EDIV
3.2%
SMLV
1.5%

Utilities

EDIV
2.4%
SMLV
2.7%

Basic Materials

EDIV
1.5%
SMLV
3.3%

Healthcare

EDIV
1.4%
SMLV
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

3.90

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

10.99

-7.29

EDIV vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than SMLV's maximum drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-42.45%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-7.34%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-20.40%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-20.40%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-42.45%

+1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.59%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-5.41%

-13.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.60%

+0.94%

Volatility

EDIV vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.75%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

10.09%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

15.46%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

18.23%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

20.91%

-3.61%

EDIV vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than SMLV's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.16%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.23%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and SMLV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to SMLV (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 10-year performance, SMLV leads with 10.42% vs 8.40% for EDIV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.23% for SMLV.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer