EDIV vs. ONEV
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while ONEV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDIV returned 8.98%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for ONEV. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ONEV.
Performance
EDIV vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than ONEV's 6.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed ONEV with an annualized return of 8.98%, while ONEV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
ONEV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
EDIV vs. ONEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.31% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 6.35% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 13.28% | -8.15% | 29.19% | 6.66% | 30.66% | -5.30% | 18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and ONEV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015 | 0.47 |
EDIV vs. ONEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
ONEV
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
EDIV
ONEV
Communication Services
EDIV
ONEV
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
ONEV
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
ONEV
Industrials
EDIV
ONEV
Technology
EDIV
ONEV
Real Estate
EDIV
ONEV
Energy
EDIV
ONEV
Utilities
EDIV
ONEV
Basic Materials
EDIV
ONEV
Healthcare
EDIV
ONEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. ONEV — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
ONEV
EDIV vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.54 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 5.26 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.07 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.55 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.66 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.67 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than ONEV's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and ONEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -39.72% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -7.75% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -14.81% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -18.52% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | -39.72% | -1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -0.94% | -5.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -3.90% | -15.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.27% | +1.12% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) at 2.35%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | ONEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 2.35% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 7.74% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 11.19% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 14.54% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.03% | +0.47% |
EDIV vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than ONEV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.59% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and ONEV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to ONEV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs ONEV's -39.72%.
On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.12% vs 8.98% for EDIV. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.76% for ONEV.
EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ONEV is Volatility Hedged Equity. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.20% for ONEV.
ONEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and ONEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer