PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than ISCB's 14.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed ISCB with an annualized return of 8.40%, while ISCB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.09% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.79%
6M
6.50%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
8.40%
ALL TIME*
3.21%

ISCB

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.72%
6M
7.74%
YTD
14.44%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.11%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
14.44%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and ISCB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011

0.57

The correlation between EDIV and ISCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDIV vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDIV
ISCB

Financial Services

30.3%
16.0%

Communication Services

14.0%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

13.2%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
11.3%

Technology

9.7%
15.5%

Industrials

9.2%
17.1%

Real Estate

3.3%
8.1%

Energy

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.5%
3.6%

Healthcare

1.4%
15.1%

Financial Services

EDIV
30.3%
ISCB
16.0%

Communication Services

EDIV
14.0%
ISCB
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

EDIV
13.2%
ISCB
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EDIV
11.9%
ISCB
11.3%

Technology

EDIV
9.7%
ISCB
15.5%

Industrials

EDIV
9.2%
ISCB
17.1%

Real Estate

EDIV
3.3%
ISCB
8.1%

Energy

EDIV
3.2%
ISCB
4.3%

Utilities

EDIV
2.4%
ISCB
2.4%

Basic Materials

EDIV
1.5%
ISCB
3.6%

Healthcare

EDIV
1.4%
ISCB
15.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVISCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.70

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

9.61

-5.91

EDIV vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-61.25%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-9.39%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-26.22%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-29.94%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-44.18%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-2.03%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-9.75%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.63%

+0.91%

Volatility

EDIV vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 3.09%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.09%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

11.57%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

16.46%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

21.29%

-7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

22.61%

-5.31%

EDIV vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than ISCB's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.16%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.29%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and ISCB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to ISCB (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 10-year performance, ISCB leads with 9.09% vs 8.40% for EDIV. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 1.29% for ISCB.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ISCB is Small Cap Blend Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.04% for ISCB.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer