EDIV vs. IEFA
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDIV returned 8.98%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for IEFA. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IEFA.
Performance
EDIV vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 7.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EDIV having a 8.98% annualized return and IEFA not far ahead at 9.37%.
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
EDIV vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.31% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 7.49% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and IEFA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EDIV and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDIV vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
IEFA
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
EDIV
IEFA
Communication Services
EDIV
IEFA
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
IEFA
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
IEFA
Industrials
EDIV
IEFA
Technology
EDIV
IEFA
Real Estate
EDIV
IEFA
Energy
EDIV
IEFA
Utilities
EDIV
IEFA
Basic Materials
EDIV
IEFA
Healthcare
EDIV
IEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
IEFA
EDIV vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.71 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 6.52 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.47 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.50 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -34.78% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -11.50% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -13.76% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -30.41% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | -34.78% | -5.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -2.44% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -6.69% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.02% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.14%, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 4.54% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 12.74% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 15.22% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 16.55% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.32% | +0.18% |
EDIV vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than IEFA's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.59% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and IEFA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to EDIV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs IEFA's -34.78%.
On 10-year performance, IEFA leads with 9.37% vs 8.98% for EDIV. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.30% for IEFA.
EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.07% for IEFA.
IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer