EDGQ vs. QDPL

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. EDGQ is actively managed, while QDPL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.

Performance

EDGQ vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EDGQ

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDPL

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 21.04%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGQ vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	17.15%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and QDPL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.87

Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 60
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGQ vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDGQ	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.37	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.82	—

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and QDPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGQ	QDPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-22.59%	+14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-1.42%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-5.10%	+3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDGQ	QDPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	12.46%	+7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	15.06%	+4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	15.06%	+4.73%

EDGQ vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGQ vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than QDPL's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	4.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	4.57%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGQ and QDPL in my portfolio?

EDGQ and QDPL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDGQ or QDPL?

On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGQ or QDPL?

EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGQ or QDPL?

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.45% for EDGQ.

What is the main difference between EDGQ and QDPL?

EDGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.60% for QDPL.