EDGQ vs. ARMW
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 19.11%
- YTD
- 287.65%
- 6M
- 278.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 14.57% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 227.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and ARMW is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -48.47% | +40.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.58% | -21.98% | +17.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -25.27% | +23.71% |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.80% | 94.53% | -74.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 94.53% | -74.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 94.53% | -74.73% |
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than ARMW's 26.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 26.61% | 16.38% |
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 4.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGQ and ARMW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 26.61%, compared with 4.29% for EDGQ.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer