EDGI vs. EFAS
EDGI (3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EDGI is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past year, EDGI returned 23.34% vs 26.33% for EFAS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGI charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
EDGI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDGI achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 12.32% return.
EDGI
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 12.80%
- 1Y
- 26.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- —
EDGI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF | 8.42% | 26.77% | -7.13% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 12.32% | 46.83% | -6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGI and EFAS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EDGI and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDGI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDGI
EFAS
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
EDGI
EFAS
Technology
EDGI
EFAS
Financial Services
EDGI
EFAS
Consumer Cyclical
EDGI
EFAS
Basic Materials
EDGI
EFAS
Healthcare
EDGI
EFAS
Communication Services
EDGI
EFAS
Consumer Defensive
EDGI
EFAS
Energy
EDGI
EFAS
Real Estate
EDGI
EFAS
Utilities
EDGI
EFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
EDGI
EFAS
EDGI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDGI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.99 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 12.82 | -6.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGI drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGI and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -44.38% | +29.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.84% | -5.30% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -3.56% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -7.05% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 2.06% | +1.57% |
Volatility
EDGI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.52%. This indicates that EDGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 3.52% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 8.69% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 10.95% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 15.59% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 18.31% | -1.82% |
EDGI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
EDGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than EFAS's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF | 1.82% | 1.97% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.75% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDGI has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to EFAS (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGI dropped -14.52% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 1-year performance, EFAS leads with 26.33% vs 23.34% for EDGI. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 26.33% return vs 23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for EDGI.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 1.82% for EDGI.
They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for EDGI and 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDGI and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer