EDD vs. EMLC

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) and EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EDD returned 5.76%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for EMLC. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDD charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMLC.

Performance

EDD vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, EDD has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 5.76%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.

EDD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 5.73%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 6M: 6.18%
• 1Y: 25.22%
• 3Y*: 16.60%
• 5Y*: 7.43%
• 10Y*: 5.76%

EMLC

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: 6.71%
• 5Y*: 1.96%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDD vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	8.33%	32.46%	8.64%	14.09%	-14.15%	-7.03%	-2.84%	25.45%	-14.09%	16.34%
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF	2.55%	18.81%	-2.97%	11.18%	-10.58%	-9.72%	3.08%	9.79%	-7.57%	13.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and EMLC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010	0.54

The correlation between EDD and EMLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EDD vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDD

EDD Risk / Return Rank: 30
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

EMLC

EMLC Risk / Return Rank: 40
EMLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EMLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
EMLC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EMLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EMLC Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDD vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDD	EMLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.46	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.06	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.29	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.67	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	5.55	-0.92

EDD vs. EMLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the EMLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and EMLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDD vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than EMLC's maximum drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and EMLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDD	EMLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.38%	-32.43%	-26.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-6.19%	-11.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.67%	-9.15%	-8.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.04%	-23.91%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.70%	-26.47%	-16.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.67%	-2.74%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.20%	-14.34%	-9.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	1.86%	+3.60%

Volatility

EDD vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) at 2.30%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDD	EMLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	2.30%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	6.23%	+6.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.36%	7.10%	+9.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.39%	9.13%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	10.03%	+7.70%

EDD vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDD has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDD vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than EMLC's 6.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	8.92%	9.76%	11.45%	7.30%	6.82%	6.93%	6.92%	8.15%	9.90%	8.18%	10.32%	12.65%
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF	6.09%	5.91%	6.55%	5.97%	5.54%	5.25%	4.90%	6.25%	6.50%	5.34%	5.32%	6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDD and EMLC in my portfolio?

EDD and EMLC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDD or EMLC?

EDD has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to EMLC (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs EMLC's -32.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.