EDD vs. MSD
EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while MSD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EDD returned 5.76%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for MSD. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EDD vs. MSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than MSD's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EDD has outperformed MSD with an annualized return of 5.76%, while MSD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.
EDD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
MSD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 1.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
EDD vs. MSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 8.33% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | 16.34% |
MSD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. | 1.32% | 5.58% | 24.92% | 19.14% | -22.10% | 2.20% | 0.73% | 24.38% | -12.31% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDD and MSD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EDD and MSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDD vs. MSD — Risk / Return Rank
EDD
MSD
EDD vs. MSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDD | MSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.04 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.17 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 0.46 | +4.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDD vs. MSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, roughly equal to the maximum MSD drawdown of -58.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and MSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDD | MSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -58.51% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -10.59% | -7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.67% | -12.84% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.04% | -33.89% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.70% | -37.50% | -5.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -5.58% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.20% | -11.29% | -12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 3.92% | +1.54% |
Volatility
EDD vs. MSD - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) at 2.85%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDD | MSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 2.85% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 8.36% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 10.30% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 14.06% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 14.74% | +2.99% |
Dividends
EDD vs. MSD - Dividend Comparison
EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, which matches MSD's 8.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 8.92% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
MSD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. | 8.86% | 9.88% | 11.88% | 10.90% | 7.34% | 4.99% | 4.67% | 5.37% | 6.56% | 5.81% | 6.87% | 7.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDD and MSD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDD has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to MSD (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs MSD's -58.51%.
EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDD and MSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer