EDC vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EDC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDC returned 8.70%/yr vs 45.33%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

EDC vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 82.36% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EDC has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 8.70%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.

EDC

• 1D: -3.74%
• 1M: 26.16%
• YTD: 82.36%
• 6M: 92.21%
• 1Y: 200.25%
• 3Y*: 52.64%
• 5Y*: -0.27%
• 10Y*: 8.70%

TQQQ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 33.35%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 55.93%
• 1Y: 137.89%
• 3Y*: 69.49%
• 5Y*: 28.37%
• 10Y*: 45.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	82.36%	94.58%	-2.00%	7.48%	-60.25%	-20.81%	6.49%	43.92%	-49.87%	138.61%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	64.46%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and TQQQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	0.67

The correlation between EDC and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDC vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDC	TQQQ
Technology	32.7%	53.8%
Financial Services	20.8%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	12.3%
Communication Services	7.8%	15.8%
Industrials	7.3%	2.8%
Basic Materials	7.0%	1.1%
Energy	4.4%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	7.7%
Healthcare	3.2%	4.2%
Utilities	2.2%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

EDC vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC

EDC Risk / Return Rank: 83
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDC	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.38	2.92	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.09	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.40	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.31	3.75	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.68	12.27	+6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDC vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDC	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38	2.92	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.43	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.69	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.74	-0.69

Drawdowns

EDC vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDC	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.54%	-81.66%	-10.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.98%	-36.97%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.48%	-58.04%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.99%	-81.66%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.01%	-81.66%	-5.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.29%	-0.76%	-60.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.36%	-18.52%	-46.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.77%	11.28%	-0.51%

Volatility

EDC vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a higher volatility of 25.80% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that EDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDC	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.80%	13.29%	+12.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.94%	36.04%	+15.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.67%	47.60%	+12.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.68%	66.53%	-9.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.69%	65.96%	-5.27%

EDC vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDC vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares	0.93%	1.79%	3.94%	3.54%	0.00%	0.18%	0.44%	0.97%	0.78%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.36%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDC and TQQQ in my portfolio?

EDC and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDC or TQQQ?

EDC has higher volatility (25.80%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, EDC or TQQQ?

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 8.70% for EDC. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDC or TQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDC or TQQQ?

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDC or TQQQ?

EDC has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

What is the main difference between EDC and TQQQ?

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.