EDC vs. IREG
EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) and IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EDC is passively managed, while IREG is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDC charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IREG.
Performance
EDC vs. IREG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 55.46% return, which is significantly higher than IREG's 15.19% return.
EDC
- 1D
- -17.43%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 55.46%
- 6M
- 58.75%
- 1Y
- 138.81%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- -2.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
IREG
- 1D
- -7.71%
- 1M
- -15.58%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- -7.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDC vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 55.46% | 7.50% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 15.19% | 16.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDC and IREG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDC vs. IREG — Risk / Return Rank
EDC
IREG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDC vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDC | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDC vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than IREG's maximum drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and IREG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDC | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -80.08% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.00% | -54.09% | -12.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -44.16% | -21.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | — | — |
Volatility
EDC vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDC | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.25% | 207.96% | -139.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.62% | 207.96% | -149.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.23% | 207.96% | -146.73% |
EDC vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDC vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison
EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while IREG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 1.10% | 1.79% | 3.94% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 0.97% | 0.78% | 0.25% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDC and IREG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.
EDC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for IREG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 0.75% for IREG.
Find the right allocation for EDC and IREG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer