IREG vs. RDTL
IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) and RDTL (GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IREG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for RDTL.
Performance
IREG vs. RDTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IREG achieves a -57.67% return, which is significantly higher than RDTL's -75.86% return.
IREG
- 1D
- -7.42%
- 1M
- -24.60%
- 6M
- -76.50%
- YTD
- -57.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RDTL
- 1D
- -41.98%
- 1M
- -53.08%
- 6M
- -58.69%
- YTD
- -75.86%
- 1Y
- -71.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -40.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.88M | $7.65M | $9.55M | |
| $19.36M | $13.86M | $13.20M |
IREG vs. RDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | -57.67% | 16.86% |
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF | -75.86% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IREG and RDTL is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IREG vs. RDTL — Risk / Return Rank
IREG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDTL
IREG vs. RDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG) and GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IREG | RDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IREG vs. RDTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IREG drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, roughly equal to the maximum RDTL drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IREG and RDTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IREG | RDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -85.30% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -85.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.13% | -85.30% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.75% | -47.12% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 60.27% | — |
Volatility
IREG vs. RDTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IREG | RDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 61.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 110.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 225.92% | 142.35% | +83.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 225.92% | 146.59% | +79.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 225.92% | 146.59% | +79.33% |
IREG vs. RDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IREG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IREG vs. RDTL - Dividend Comparison
Neither IREG nor RDTL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IREG and RDTL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDTL.
IREG and RDTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IREG and 1.50% for RDTL.
Find the right allocation for IREG and RDTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer