PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDC vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDC vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDC achieves a 62.45% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 80.33% return.


EDC

1D
1.22%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
62.45%
6M
72.90%
1Y
137.10%
3Y*
43.12%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
8.38%

HIBL

1D
4.55%
1M
15.37%
YTD
80.33%
6M
73.92%
1Y
226.21%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDC vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
62.45%94.58%-2.00%7.48%-60.25%-20.81%6.49%13.08%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
80.33%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EDC and HIBL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

0.66

The correlation between EDC and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDC vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDC
HIBL

Technology

32.7%
45.8%

Financial Services

20.8%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
12.9%

Communication Services

7.8%
3.7%

Industrials

7.3%
11.7%

Basic Materials

7.0%
4.6%

Energy

4.4%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
0.6%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.9%

Utilities

2.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

EDC
32.7%
HIBL
45.8%

Financial Services

EDC
20.8%
HIBL
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EDC
10.3%
HIBL
12.9%

Communication Services

EDC
7.8%
HIBL
3.7%

Industrials

EDC
7.3%
HIBL
11.7%

Basic Materials

EDC
7.0%
HIBL
4.6%

Energy

EDC
4.4%
HIBL
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

EDC
3.2%
HIBL
0.6%

Healthcare

EDC
3.2%
HIBL
2.9%

Utilities

EDC
2.2%
HIBL
3.2%

Real Estate

EDC
1.1%
HIBL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDC vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDC
EDC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDC vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDCHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

7.25

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

25.38

-13.13

EDC vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDC and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDC vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDC drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDC and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDCHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-88.27%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.98%

-31.39%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.48%

-69.66%

+20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.70%

-81.58%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.52%

-10.19%

-55.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.35%

-44.05%

-21.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.25%

8.96%

+2.29%

Volatility

EDC vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) have volatilities of 33.39% and 34.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDCHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.39%

34.70%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.40%

57.54%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.72%

71.43%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.74%

83.04%

-25.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.12%

92.32%

-31.20%

EDC vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDC has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDC vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

EDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than HIBL's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDC
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares
1.05%1.79%3.94%3.54%0.00%0.18%0.44%0.97%0.78%0.25%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.28%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDC and HIBL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (34.70%) compared to EDC (33.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDC dropped -92.54% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, HIBL leads with 10.57% vs -2.02% for EDC. On fees, HIBL is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, EDC has been the lower-risk option at 33.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 10.57% return vs -2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIBL is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.05% for EDC.

EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%), while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for EDC and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDC and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer