ED vs. GRMN
ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) and GRMN (Garmin Ltd.) are both stocks. ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while GRMN operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ED returned 7.01%/yr vs 22.02%/yr for GRMN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ED vs. GRMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than GRMN's 17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed GRMN with an annualized return of 7.01%, while GRMN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.02% annualized return.
ED
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
GRMN
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
ED vs. GRMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 10.24% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 17.83% | -0.06% | 63.25% | 43.12% | -30.20% | 15.90% | 25.86% | 58.13% | 9.84% | 27.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ED and GRMN is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2000 | 0.17 |
The correlation between ED and GRMN shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ED:
$39.26B
GRMN:
$46.09B
ED:
$5.94
GRMN:
$8.97
ED:
18.13
GRMN:
26.55
ED:
1.29
GRMN:
2.13
ED:
2.27
GRMN:
6.18
ED:
1.67
GRMN:
4.97
ED:
$17.22B
GRMN:
$7.46B
ED:
$11.62B
GRMN:
$4.41B
ED:
$8.47B
GRMN:
$2.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ED vs. GRMN — Risk / Return Rank
ED
GRMN
ED vs. GRMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Garmin Ltd. (GRMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ED | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.12 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 1.27 | +0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ED vs. GRMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, smaller than the maximum GRMN drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and GRMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ED | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -87.71% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -27.97% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -27.97% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -54.63% | +32.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | -54.63% | +23.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -11.00% | +5.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -31.54% | +18.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 12.79% | -8.20% |
Volatility
ED vs. GRMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.98%, while Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ED | GRMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 8.24% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 22.18% | -9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 30.32% | -13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 30.41% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 28.36% | -7.35% |
Dividends
ED vs. GRMN - Dividend Comparison
ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than GRMN's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.23% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 1.51% | 1.70% | 1.44% | 2.27% | 3.10% | 1.92% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 3.32% | 3.42% | 4.21% | 5.41% |
Financials
ED vs. GRMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ED vs. GRMN - Profitability Comparison
ED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.
GRMN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
ED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
GRMN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported an operating income of 431.67M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.6%.
ED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
GRMN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Garmin Ltd. reported a net income of 405.08M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ED and GRMN have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRMN has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to ED (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs GRMN's -87.71%.
GRMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ED and GRMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer