ECOW vs. QDPL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL).

ECOW and QDPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021.

Performance

ECOW vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ECOW vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	9.27%	32.50%	3.17%	15.79%	-19.28%	-2.49%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	-3.59%	16.52%	22.83%	23.66%	-16.25%	8.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's -3.59% return.

ECOW

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 6M: 13.41%
• 1Y: 36.29%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: —

QDPL

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: -3.59%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECOW vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.

ECOW

Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF

QDPL

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF

Return for Risk

ECOW vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 91
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 53
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECOW vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECOW	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	0.90	+1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	1.39	+1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.21	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	1.37	+1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.23	6.55	+7.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECOW vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECOW and QDPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECOW	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	0.90	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.64	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between ECOW and QDPL is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ECOW vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than QDPL's 5.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.76%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.10%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ECOW vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and QDPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECOW	QDPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.27%	-22.59%	-17.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	-11.94%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-5.40%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.29%	-5.30%	-5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.50%	+0.14%

Volatility

ECOW vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 5.36%. This indicates that ECOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECOW	QDPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	5.36%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	9.41%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.60%	18.01%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.66%	15.11%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.25%	15.11%	+5.14%