ECOW vs. ICOW
ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECOW is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECOW returned 6.12%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECOW charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
ECOW vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.
ECOW
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 35.35%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ECOW vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.10% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECOW and ICOW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ECOW and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
ECOW vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECOW
ICOW
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Communication Services
ECOW
ICOW
Energy
ECOW
ICOW
Industrials
ECOW
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
ECOW
ICOW
Technology
ECOW
ICOW
Basic Materials
ECOW
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
ECOW
ICOW
Utilities
ECOW
ICOW
-
Healthcare
ECOW
ICOW
Financial Services
ECOW
-
ICOW
-
Real Estate
ECOW
-
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECOW vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
ECOW
ICOW
ECOW vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECOW | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.50 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 4.91 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | 17.54 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECOW | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.61 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ECOW vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECOW | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -43.49% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -8.02% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -14.81% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.67% | -28.48% | -5.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -0.64% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -7.59% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.24% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ECOW vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 4.41%. This indicates that ECOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECOW | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 4.41% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 10.59% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 13.73% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.64% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 18.47% | +1.66% |
ECOW vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECOW vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.60% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECOW and ICOW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECOW has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 6.12% for ECOW. On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.
ECOW is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ECOW and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECOW and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer