ECO vs. CLS
ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. ECO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past year, ECO returned 148.51% vs 175.49% for CLS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ECO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECO achieves a 65.79% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 26.03% return.
ECO
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 65.79%
- 6M
- 65.40%
- 1Y
- 148.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 26.03%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 175.49%
- 3Y*
- 196.86%
- 5Y*
- 116.85%
- 10Y*
- 43.04%
ECO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 65.79% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.25% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 26.03% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECO and CLS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
ECO:
$2.00B
CLS:
$43.10B
ECO:
$5.83
CLS:
$8.28
ECO:
9.00
CLS:
44.97
ECO:
0.85
CLS:
0.60
ECO:
3.71
CLS:
3.13
ECO:
2.76
CLS:
20.54
ECO:
$481.57M
CLS:
$13.81B
ECO:
$274.61M
CLS:
$1.60B
ECO:
$284.05M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
ECO
CLS
ECO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.34 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.23 | 5.97 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.50 | 14.26 | +9.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECO drawdown since its inception was -46.15%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECO and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.15% | -96.93% | +50.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.66% | -29.24% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -21.14% | +16.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.08% | -73.28% | +58.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 12.21% | -5.98% |
Volatility
ECO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) is 12.35%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.00%. This indicates that ECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 27.00% | -14.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.55% | 53.80% | -23.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.08% | 72.73% | -32.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.87% | 57.74% | -15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.87% | 50.01% | -8.14% |
Dividends
ECO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 9.53% | 6.26% | 15.57% |
Financials
ECO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ECO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
ECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
ECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
ECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ECO and CLS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.00%) compared to ECO (12.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECO dropped -46.15% vs CLS's -96.93%.
ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECO and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer