ECNS vs. KJD
ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) and KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) are both China Equities funds. ECNS is passively managed, while KJD is actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ECNS charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for KJD.
Performance
ECNS vs. KJD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly lower than KJD's 24.37% return.
ECNS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- -15.13%
- YTD
- -10.84%
- 1Y
- -10.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -7.01%
- 10Y*
- 0.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.21%
KJD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 50.90%
- 6M
- 28.04%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $217.02K | $210.44K | $354.53K | |
| $81.04K | $59.94K | $80.44K |
ECNS vs. KJD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | -10.84% | -6.49% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 24.37% | -28.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECNS and KJD is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECNS vs. KJD — Risk / Return Rank
ECNS
KJD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ECNS vs. KJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECNS | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECNS vs. KJD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than KJD's maximum drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and KJD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECNS | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -50.81% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.60% | -16.94% | -25.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.51% | -30.05% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.01% | — | — |
Volatility
ECNS vs. KJD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECNS | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.87% | 60.80% | -39.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 60.80% | -31.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 60.80% | -34.98% |
ECNS vs. KJD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KJD's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECNS vs. KJD - Dividend Comparison
ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, while KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 6.60% | 6.20% | 5.98% | 4.89% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.29% | 3.58% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECNS and KJD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECNS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECNS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECNS and 1.26% for KJD.
Find the right allocation for ECNS and KJD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer