ECNS vs. IBIT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECNS is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Small Cap Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ECNS returned -10.63% vs -43.69% for IBIT. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ECNS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

ECNS vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECNS achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.17% return.

ECNS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: -15.13%
• YTD: -10.84%
• 1Y: -10.63%
• 3Y*: 3.54%
• 5Y*: -7.01%
• 10Y*: 0.89%
• ALL TIME*: 0.21%

IBIT

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 3.70%
• 6M: -18.23%
• YTD: -27.17%
• 1Y: -43.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	$217.02K	$210.44K	$354.53K
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	$1.33B	$1.34B	$1.65B

ECNS vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	-10.84%	36.49%	13.92%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.17%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ECNS and IBIT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.29

Return for Risk

ECNS vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECNS

ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 5
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECNS vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECNS	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	-0.99	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.57	-1.44	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.84	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	-0.82	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	-1.26	+0.44

ECNS vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECNS Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECNS and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECNS vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECNS drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECNS and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECNS	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.43%	-53.30%	-10.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.73%	-53.30%	+27.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.60%	-49.28%	+6.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.51%	-18.29%	-11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.01%	34.80%	-21.79%

Volatility

ECNS vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) is 6.37%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that ECNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECNS	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	8.98%	-2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.27%	33.79%	-19.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	44.48%	-23.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.09%	49.57%	-20.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.82%	49.57%	-23.75%

ECNS vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECNS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECNS vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ECNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	6.60%	6.20%	5.98%	4.89%	3.54%	4.87%	3.59%	3.23%	6.16%	3.18%	4.29%	3.58%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECNS and IBIT in my portfolio?

ECNS and IBIT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECNS or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to ECNS (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECNS dropped -63.43% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

Which ETF is better, ECNS or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, ECNS leads with -10.63% vs -43.69% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECNS or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, ECNS has performed better with a -10.63% return vs -43.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECNS or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECNS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECNS or IBIT?

ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between ECNS and IBIT?

ECNS is categorized as China Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECNS and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.