PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECLN vs. NFRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECLN vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ECLN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFRA

1D
0.12%
1M
1.71%
6M
9.98%
YTD
9.45%
1Y
14.15%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECLN vs. NFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
12.96%16.78%22.60%-3.36%5.28%12.26%8.98%5.66%
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
9.45%18.42%4.76%8.96%-10.11%9.61%2.24%7.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ECLN and NFRA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019

0.74

The correlation between ECLN and NFRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECLN vs. NFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECLN
NFRA

Utilities

76.4%
23.1%

Energy

16.3%
8.7%

Industrials

6.8%
32.2%

Technology

0.5%
1.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

25.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

4.9%

Utilities

ECLN
76.4%
NFRA
23.1%

Energy

ECLN
16.3%
NFRA
8.7%

Industrials

ECLN
6.8%
NFRA
32.2%

Technology

ECLN
0.5%
NFRA
1.3%

Basic Materials

ECLN

-

NFRA

-

Communication Services

ECLN

-

NFRA
25.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ECLN

-

NFRA
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

ECLN

-

NFRA
0.1%

Financial Services

ECLN

-

NFRA
0.0%

Healthcare

ECLN

-

NFRA
4.2%

Real Estate

ECLN

-

NFRA
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECLN vs. NFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NFRA
NFRA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECLN vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECLNNFRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

ECLN vs. NFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECLN vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECLNNFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

Volatility

ECLN vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECLNNFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

ECLN vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NFRA's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECLN vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison

ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
1.43%1.97%2.52%2.54%1.72%1.66%1.68%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFRA
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund
5.65%6.00%3.33%2.57%2.28%2.71%2.22%2.27%3.06%2.81%2.98%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECLN and NFRA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NFRA is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NFRA is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

NFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ECLN and 0.47% for NFRA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECLN and NFRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer