ECLN vs. NFRA
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA).
ECLN and NFRA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ECLN is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 19, 2019. NFRA is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2013.
Performance
ECLN vs. NFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ECLN vs. NFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 13.60% | 16.78% | 22.60% | -3.36% | 5.28% | 12.26% | 8.98% | 5.66% |
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.94% | 18.42% | 4.76% | 8.96% | -10.11% | 9.61% | 2.24% | 7.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECLN achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than NFRA's 5.94% return.
ECLN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
NFRA
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 17.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ECLN vs. NFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECLN has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NFRA's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ECLN vs. NFRA — Risk / Return Rank
ECLN
NFRA
ECLN vs. NFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) and FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECLN | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.42 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 1.98 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.31 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 8.54 | +4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECLN | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.42 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.47 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.47 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between ECLN and NFRA is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ECLN vs. NFRA - Dividend Comparison
ECLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than NFRA's 5.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECLN First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFRA FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund | 5.69% | 6.00% | 3.33% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.71% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 2.98% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
ECLN vs. NFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECLN drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, roughly equal to the maximum NFRA drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECLN and NFRA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECLN | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -32.49% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -7.84% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.88% | -22.75% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -4.83% | +3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -4.56% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.12% | -0.12% |
Volatility
ECLN vs. NFRA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN) is 2.87%, while FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure Index Fund (NFRA) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that ECLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ECLN | NFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 4.51% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 7.58% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 12.55% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 12.90% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 14.96% | +2.56% |