PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ECH vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ECH vs. EFAV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ECH (iShares MSCI Chile ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - ECH tracks the MSCI Chile Investable Market Index while EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECH returned 4.25%/yr vs 5.93%/yr for EFAV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECH charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.

Performance

ECH vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECH achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than EFAV's 3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ECH has underperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 4.25%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively higher 5.93% annualized return.

ECH

1D
-1.65%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
3.73%
1Y
29.60%
3Y*
14.12%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
4.25%

EFAV

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.83%
6M
5.18%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECH vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF		-1.19%65.41%-8.67%9.01%25.12%-19.80%-7.13%-17.79%-18.98%41.79%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF		3.83%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ECH and EFAV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.51

The correlation between ECH and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

ECH vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ECH
EFAV

Financial Services

24.6%
19.9%

Basic Materials

21.0%
1.6%

Industrials

14.4%
15.1%

Utilities

12.3%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
5.2%

Real Estate

9.2%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
11.5%

Communication Services

1.6%
9.7%

Energy

-

8.2%

Healthcare

-

12.4%

Technology

-

4.5%

Financial Services

ECH
24.6%
EFAV
19.9%

Basic Materials

ECH
21.0%
EFAV
1.6%

Industrials

ECH
14.4%
EFAV
15.1%

Utilities

ECH
12.3%
EFAV
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ECH
10.7%
EFAV
5.2%

Real Estate

ECH
9.2%
EFAV
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

ECH
6.3%
EFAV
11.5%

Communication Services

ECH
1.6%
EFAV
9.7%

Energy

ECH

-

EFAV
8.2%

Healthcare

ECH

-

EFAV
12.4%

Technology

ECH

-

EFAV
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Chile ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF

Often compared with ECH:
ECH vs. EWZECH vs. EWWECH vs. EPUECH vs. EWZSECH vs. EPOLECH vs. EWYECH vs. SCHD
Often compared with EFAV:
EFAV vs. EFVEFAV vs. EFAEFAV vs. ACWVEFAV vs. EEMVEFAV vs. USMVEFAV vs. EFASEFAV vs. SPLV

Return for Risk

ECH vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ECH
ECH Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ECH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECH Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ECH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECH vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ECHEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
0.92

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.70
1.33

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

4.10

-0.28

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECH vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECH Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECH and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ECHEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.92

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.53

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.45

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.53

-0.48

Drawdowns

ECH vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECH drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECH and EFAV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ECHEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-27.56%

-46.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.65%

-6.46%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.59%

-8.75%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

-27.46%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.89%

-27.56%

-39.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.58%

-5.61%

-20.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.52%

-4.77%

-32.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

2.30%

+5.46%

Volatility

ECH vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Chile ETF (ECH) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that ECH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ECHEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

3.17%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.29%

8.17%

+12.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

10.35%

+14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.51%

11.79%

+15.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.21%

13.21%

+14.00%

ECH vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECH has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECH vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

ECH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECH
iShares MSCI Chile ETF		2.04%2.01%3.12%4.77%6.73%5.49%2.16%2.47%2.37%1.42%1.85%2.13%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF		3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

ECH and EFAV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECH has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECH dropped -74.08% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, EFAV leads with 5.93% vs 4.25% for ECH. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFAV has performed better with a 5.93% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECH.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.04% for ECH.

ECH tracks MSCI Chile Investable Market Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ECH and 0.20% for EFAV.

ECH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECH and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer