ECAT vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - ECAT is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, ECAT returned 20.46% vs 29.68% for QQQI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ECAT charges 1.38%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

ECAT vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAT achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.04% return.

ECAT

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 9.71%
• 1Y: 20.46%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECAT vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	11.44%	16.64%	15.09%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.04%	18.62%	19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ECAT and QQQI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.64

The correlation between ECAT and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ECAT vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAT

ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 26
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAT vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ECAT	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.30	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.05	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.42	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	3.10	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.53	13.93	-7.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ECAT vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAT and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ECAT	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	2.30	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.32	-0.77

Drawdowns

ECAT vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAT drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAT and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECAT	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-20.00%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.80%	-9.61%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-0.52%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.11%	-2.19%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	2.14%	+1.00%

Volatility

ECAT vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.69%. This indicates that ECAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECAT	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	2.69%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	9.85%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	12.98%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	17.05%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	17.05%	-0.16%

ECAT vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECAT has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECAT vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.67%, more than QQQI's 13.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust	21.67%	23.00%	17.44%	9.14%	8.94%	0.54%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.24%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECAT and QQQI in my portfolio?

ECAT and QQQI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ECAT or QQQI?

ECAT has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to QQQI (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECAT dropped -32.23% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.