ECAT vs. JQC
ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) and JQC (Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund) are both mutual funds - ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock, while JQC is a Bank Loan fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 3 years, ECAT returned 17.59%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for JQC. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ECAT charges 1.43%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for JQC.
Performance
ECAT vs. JQC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECAT achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 1.97% return.
ECAT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
JQC
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- -2.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.46M | $7.38M | $7.72M | |
| $2.37M | $2.54M | $2.74M |
ECAT vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 10.45% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 1.97% | -0.36% | 22.29% | 15.26% | -14.22% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECAT and JQC is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECAT vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank
ECAT
JQC
ECAT vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECAT | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.25 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | -0.47 | +4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECAT vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECAT drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAT and JQC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECAT | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.23% | -75.18% | +42.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -10.15% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.79% | -15.37% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -4.17% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -8.78% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 5.32% | -2.08% |
Volatility
ECAT vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 1.47%. This indicates that ECAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECAT | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 1.47% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | 8.52% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.17% | 11.13% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 13.08% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 17.49% | -0.67% |
ECAT vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECAT has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECAT vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison
ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.31%, more than JQC's 13.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 22.31% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 13.14% | 12.91% | 11.39% | 11.42% | 9.71% | 10.03% | 16.11% | 16.14% | 6.53% | 7.42% | 6.99% | 7.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECAT and JQC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to JQC (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECAT dropped -32.23% vs JQC's -75.18%.
ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECAT and JQC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer