PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECAT vs. BCAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ECAT vs. BCAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ECAT vs. BCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
-6.71%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%
BCAT
BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust
5.19%16.78%19.37%19.30%-22.64%0.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECAT achieves a -6.71% return, which is significantly lower than BCAT's 5.19% return.


ECAT

1D
1.49%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
-6.71%
6M
-7.80%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*

BCAT

1D
1.87%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
5.19%
6M
6.39%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECAT vs. BCAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BCAT
BCAT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECAT vs. BCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) and BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECATBCATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

1.57

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.68

2.21

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.31

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.34

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.75

11.21

-9.46

ECAT vs. BCAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the BCAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECAT and BCAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECATBCATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.57

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.40

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between ECAT and BCAT is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ECAT vs. BCAT - Dividend Comparison

ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.39%, more than BCAT's 22.92% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
25.39%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%
BCAT
BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust
22.92%23.45%17.48%10.08%9.01%6.42%0.48%

Drawdowns

ECAT vs. BCAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECAT drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, smaller than the maximum BCAT drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECAT and BCAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ECATBCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-36.13%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-9.65%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.48%

-6.25%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-13.18%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.02%

+1.47%

Volatility

ECAT vs. BCAT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT) at 5.10%. This indicates that ECAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ECATBCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

5.10%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

8.23%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

14.22%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

15.58%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

16.02%

+0.93%