EBIT vs. VTWV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EBIT (Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - EBIT tracks the Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index while VTWV tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EBIT returned 32.33% vs 43.58% for VTWV. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. EBIT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTWV.

Performance

EBIT vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 22.89% return.

EBIT

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 12.95%
• YTD: 18.92%
• 1Y: 32.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.17%

VTWV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 15.09%
• YTD: 22.89%
• 1Y: 43.58%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 10.42%
• ALL TIME*: 10.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	$44.42K	$33.07K	$33.60K
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF	$6.82M	$6.63M	$5.67M

EBIT vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	18.92%	6.85%	9.01%
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF	22.89%	12.72%	10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT and VTWV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024	0.95

The correlation between EBIT and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EBIT vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBIT	VTWV
Financial Services	26.2%	27.6%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	10.1%
Industrials	14.7%	12.0%
Energy	10.6%	5.6%
Real Estate	7.7%	11.3%
Technology	7.5%	7.3%
Healthcare	4.6%	10.9%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.2%
Communication Services	3.8%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.2%
Utilities	2.8%	5.1%

Return for Risk

EBIT vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EBIT

EBIT Risk / Return Rank: 82
EBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

VTWV

VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 92
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EBIT vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBIT	VTWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.31	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.28	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	4.73	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.93	17.24	-6.31

EBIT vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBIT and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBIT vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT drawdown since its inception was -26.64%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT and VTWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIT	VTWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.64%	-45.73%	+19.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-8.64%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-1.38%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-7.74%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	2.37%	+0.36%

Volatility

EBIT vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) is 3.04%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that EBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBIT	VTWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	3.31%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	12.16%	-2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.50%	17.75%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	21.53%	-0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.68%	23.48%	-2.80%

EBIT vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIT vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

EBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than VTWV's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	1.68%	2.00%	2.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.60%	1.79%	1.78%	2.02%	2.07%	1.60%	1.49%	1.82%	2.04%	1.63%	1.57%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIT and VTWV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EBIT and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EBIT or VTWV?

VTWV has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to EBIT (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIT dropped -26.64% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

Which ETF is better, EBIT or VTWV?

On 1-year performance, VTWV leads with 43.58% vs 32.33% for EBIT. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EBIT has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBIT or VTWV?

Over the 1-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 43.58% return vs 32.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIT or VTWV?

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIT or VTWV?

EBIT has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.60% for VTWV.

What is the main difference between EBIT and VTWV?

EBIT tracks Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EBIT and 0.06% for VTWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.