EBIT vs. VTWV
EBIT (Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - EBIT tracks the Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index while VTWV tracks the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EBIT returned 29.56% vs 43.90% for VTWV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EBIT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWV.
Performance
EBIT vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIT achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 18.98% return.
EBIT
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
EBIT vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF | 13.93% | 6.85% | 8.29% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 18.98% | 12.72% | 8.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIT and VTWV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between EBIT and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
EBIT vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EBIT
VTWV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
EBIT
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
EBIT
VTWV
Industrials
EBIT
VTWV
Energy
EBIT
VTWV
Technology
EBIT
VTWV
Real Estate
EBIT
VTWV
Healthcare
EBIT
VTWV
Communication Services
EBIT
VTWV
Basic Materials
EBIT
VTWV
Utilities
EBIT
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
EBIT
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIT vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
EBIT
VTWV
EBIT vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIT | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 5.11 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 17.42 | -7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIT | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.43 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.49 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
EBIT vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIT drawdown since its inception was -26.64%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIT | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.64% | -45.73% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -8.64% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -7.81% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.53% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EBIT vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) is 4.09%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that EBIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIT | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 5.00% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 12.20% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 18.16% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 21.73% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 23.54% | -2.29% |
EBIT vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIT vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
EBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VTWV's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF | 1.75% | 2.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EBIT and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to EBIT (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBIT dropped -26.64% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 1-year performance, VTWV leads with 43.90% vs 29.56% for EBIT. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EBIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 43.90% return vs 29.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EBIT.
EBIT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.
EBIT tracks Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EBIT and 0.10% for VTWV.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBIT and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer