EBIT vs. TSCV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EBIT (Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. EBIT is passively managed, while TSCV is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EBIT charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.

Performance

EBIT vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBIT achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than TSCV's 21.01% return.

EBIT

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 16.62%
• 6M: 14.65%
• 1Y: 30.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSCV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 6M: 19.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBIT vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	16.62%	3.74%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	21.01%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EBIT and TSCV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

EBIT vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBIT

EBIT Risk / Return Rank: 59
EBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
EBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 60

TSCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBIT vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBIT	TSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	—	—

Drawdowns

EBIT vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBIT drawdown since its inception was -26.64%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIT and TSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBIT	TSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.64%	-10.17%	-16.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	0.00%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.39%	-1.95%	-4.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EBIT	TSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.24%	16.73%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.12%	16.73%	+4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.12%	16.73%	+4.39%

EBIT vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBIT has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBIT vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison

EBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than TSCV's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EBIT Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF	1.71%	2.00%	2.40%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	0.23%	0.28%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBIT and TSCV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EBIT and TSCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EBIT or TSCV?

On fees, EBIT is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBIT or TSCV?

EBIT is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBIT or TSCV?

EBIT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.

What is the main difference between EBIT and TSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EBIT and 0.60% for TSCV.