EAT vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) is a stock, while GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, EAT returned 65.48%/yr vs 56.96%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EAT vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -11.31% return.

EAT

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 20.74%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: -7.70%
• 3Y*: 65.48%
• 5Y*: 24.33%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

GDMN

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -10.55%
• YTD: -11.31%
• 6M: -13.58%
• 1Y: 65.62%
• 3Y*: 56.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAT vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	14.89%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	1.84%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-11.31%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and GDMN is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.10

Return for Risk

EAT vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 29
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAT vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAT	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	1.00	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	1.47	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.21	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	1.31	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	3.42	-3.77

EAT vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAT vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAT	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.40%	-52.82%	-35.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.41%	-48.76%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.92%	-48.76%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.82%	-41.78%	+28.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.33%	-19.09%	-5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.85%	18.58%	+3.27%

Volatility

EAT vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 12.45%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.11%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAT	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.45%	22.11%	-9.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.42%	54.94%	-18.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.11%	63.83%	-16.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.03%	48.18%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.16%	48.18%	+6.98%

Dividends

EAT vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.05%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAT and GDMN in my portfolio?

EAT and GDMN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAT or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (22.11%) compared to EAT (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.