EASY vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EASY (Liberty One Defensive Dividend Growth ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EASY is a Dividend fund actively managed by Liberty One, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. EASY is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EASY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

EASY vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty One Defensive Dividend Growth ETF (EASY) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASY achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return.

EASY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASY vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EASY Liberty One Defensive Dividend Growth ETF	2.35%	-0.31%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EASY and GCOW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

EASY vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASY vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty One Defensive Dividend Growth ETF (EASY) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EASY	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.59	-0.27

Drawdowns

EASY vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASY drawdown since its inception was -7.79%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASY and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASY	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-37.64%	+29.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.79%	-2.73%	-5.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-5.84%	+3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EASY	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.65%	10.81%	-1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.65%	13.49%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.65%	16.20%	-6.55%

EASY vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EASY vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

EASY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EASY Liberty One Defensive Dividend Growth ETF	0.55%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASY and GCOW in my portfolio?

EASY and GCOW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EASY or GCOW?

On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASY or GCOW?

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for EASY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASY or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.55% for EASY.

What is the main difference between EASY and GCOW?

EASY is categorized as Dividend, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Liberty One and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for EASY and 0.60% for GCOW.