EASG vs. IEFA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA).
EASG and IEFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EASG is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2018. IEFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both EASG and IEFA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EASG vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EASG vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | -0.14% | 25.19% | 2.26% | 18.80% | -16.94% | 11.36% | 10.73% | 23.66% | -5.41% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 1.20% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -6.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 1.20% return.
EASG
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFA
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EASG vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EASG vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
EASG
IEFA
EASG vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EASG | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 1.97 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.00 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 7.79 | -1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EASG | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.48 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between EASG and IEFA is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EASG vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than IEFA's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 4.19% | 4.18% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.51% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
EASG vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and IEFA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EASG | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -34.78% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -11.50% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.42% | -30.41% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.46% | -8.15% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -6.74% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.95% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EASG vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) have volatilities of 7.84% and 7.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EASG | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | 7.89% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 11.05% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 17.64% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 16.35% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 17.24% | +1.11% |