IEFA vs. IDEV
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - IEFA tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net) while IDEV tracks the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IEFA returned 8.87%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for IDEV. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
IEFA vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IEFA having a 10.65% return and IDEV slightly lower at 10.38%.
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFA vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 10.65% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 17.93% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 10.38% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and IDEV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between IEFA and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
IDEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
IDEV
Industrials
IEFA
IDEV
Technology
IEFA
IDEV
Healthcare
IEFA
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
IDEV
Basic Materials
IEFA
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
IDEV
Communication Services
IEFA
IDEV
Energy
IEFA
IDEV
Utilities
IEFA
IDEV
Real Estate
IEFA
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
IDEV
IEFA vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.35 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 9.21 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, roughly equal to the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -34.77% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -11.20% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -13.41% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -29.15% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -6.53% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.86% | +0.16% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 4.70% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 12.69% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 14.97% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 16.33% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.28% | -0.01% |
IEFA vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEFA vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than IDEV's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.20% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.38% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IEFA and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to IDEV (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 9.19% vs 8.87% for IEFA. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IEFA.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 3.20% for IDEV.
IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.05% for IDEV.
IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer