PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EASG vs. DBEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EASG vs. DBEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than DBEZ's 13.66% return.


EASG

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.27%
6M
5.95%
YTD
11.08%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.53%

DBEZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.02%
6M
10.08%
YTD
13.66%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.37%
ALL TIME*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$401.75K$249.36K$196.33K
$107.99K$79.19K$91.05K

EASG vs. DBEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
11.08%25.19%2.26%18.80%-16.94%11.36%10.73%23.66%-5.41%
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
13.66%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and DBEZ is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018

0.85

The correlation between EASG and DBEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EASG vs. DBEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EASG
DBEZ

Financial Services

24.7%
23.6%

Industrials

17.5%
21.3%

Technology

14.8%
16.8%

Healthcare

11.0%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.7%
4.3%

Communication Services

5.2%
3.8%

Utilities

3.7%
6.2%

Energy

2.7%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.3%

Financial Services

EASG
24.7%
DBEZ
23.6%

Industrials

EASG
17.5%
DBEZ
21.3%

Technology

EASG
14.8%
DBEZ
16.8%

Healthcare

EASG
11.0%
DBEZ
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EASG
6.7%
DBEZ
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

EASG
6.4%
DBEZ
5.2%

Basic Materials

EASG
5.7%
DBEZ
4.3%

Communication Services

EASG
5.2%
DBEZ
3.8%

Utilities

EASG
3.7%
DBEZ
6.2%

Energy

EASG
2.7%
DBEZ
3.6%

Real Estate

EASG
1.7%
DBEZ
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EASG vs. DBEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EASG vs. DBEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EASGDBEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.16

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

8.52

-1.13

EASG vs. DBEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DBEZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and DBEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EASG vs. DBEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum DBEZ drawdown of -38.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and DBEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EASGDBEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-38.76%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-11.03%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-15.59%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.42%

-23.38%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.79%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-5.75%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.80%

+0.32%

Volatility

EASG vs. DBEZ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EASGDBEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.27%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

13.03%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

15.24%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.53%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

18.09%

+0.23%

EASG vs. DBEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEZ's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

EASG vs. DBEZ - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than DBEZ's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
1.26%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.83%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EASG and DBEZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EASG has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to DBEZ (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs DBEZ's -38.76%.

On 5-year performance, DBEZ leads with 12.38% vs 7.51% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.26% for DBEZ.

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBEZ is Europe Equities. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EASG and DBEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer