PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEZ vs. HEZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBEZ having a 13.66% return and HEZU slightly higher at 13.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBEZ having a 12.37% annualized return and HEZU not far ahead at 12.59%.


DBEZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.02%
6M
10.08%
YTD
13.66%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.37%
ALL TIME*
11.33%

HEZU

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.42%
6M
9.99%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$401.75K$249.36K$196.33K
$555.49K$1.29M$2.41M

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
13.66%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-10.81%15.62%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
13.74%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEZ and HEZU is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.98

The correlation between DBEZ and HEZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEZ
HEZU

Financial Services

23.6%
24.7%

Industrials

21.3%
20.5%

Technology

16.8%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
7.9%

Utilities

6.2%
6.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.8%

Financial Services

DBEZ
23.6%
HEZU
24.7%

Industrials

DBEZ
21.3%
HEZU
20.5%

Technology

DBEZ
16.8%
HEZU
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEZ
8.2%
HEZU
7.9%

Utilities

DBEZ
6.2%
HEZU
6.5%

Healthcare

DBEZ
5.8%
HEZU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBEZ
5.2%
HEZU
5.5%

Basic Materials

DBEZ
4.3%
HEZU
3.9%

Communication Services

DBEZ
3.8%
HEZU
3.9%

Energy

DBEZ
3.6%
HEZU
3.5%

Real Estate

DBEZ
1.3%
HEZU
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEZ vs. HEZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEZHEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.21

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

8.63

-0.12

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the HEZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEZ and HEZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, roughly equal to the maximum HEZU drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and HEZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEZHEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-38.80%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-10.95%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-14.83%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.38%

-22.79%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

-38.80%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-1.27%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-5.77%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.81%

-0.01%

Volatility

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEZHEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.25%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

13.47%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

15.80%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

16.61%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

18.14%

-0.05%

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than HEZU's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEZ vs. HEZU - Dividend Comparison

DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than HEZU's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
1.26%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.57%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DBEZ and HEZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBEZ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to HEZU (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs HEZU's -38.80%.

On 10-year performance, HEZU leads with 12.59% vs 12.37% for DBEZ. On fees, DBEZ is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEZU has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEZ is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HEZU.

HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.26% for DBEZ.

DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.52% for HEZU.

DBEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEZ and HEZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer