PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EASG vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EASG vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 68.39% return.


EASG

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.08%
6M
6.72%
YTD
10.28%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*

DBE

1D
-1.09%
1M
6.25%
6M
65.69%
YTD
68.39%
1Y
57.64%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
10.28%25.19%2.26%18.80%-16.94%11.36%10.73%23.66%-5.41%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
68.39%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-21.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and DBE is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018

0.16

The correlation between EASG and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EASG vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EASGDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.34

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

7.00

-0.46

EASG vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EASG vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EASGDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-86.69%

+54.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-24.72%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-24.72%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.42%

-38.74%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-36.07%

+34.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-57.19%

+51.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

8.26%

-5.09%

Volatility

EASG vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 4.17%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EASGDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

11.68%

-7.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

32.70%

-19.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

35.99%

-19.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

29.88%

-13.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

28.39%

-10.05%

EASG vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EASG vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than DBE's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.29%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.86%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


EASG and DBE have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to EASG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.10% vs 7.65% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.29% for DBE.

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EASG and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer