EASG vs. BKIE
EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EASG tracks the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EASG returned 7.13%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for BKIE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
EASG vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 9.43% return.
EASG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 18.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
EASG vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 8.96% | 25.19% | 2.26% | 18.80% | -16.94% | 11.36% | 35.53% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 9.43% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EASG and BKIE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EASG and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
EASG vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EASG
BKIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
EASG
BKIE
Industrials
EASG
BKIE
Technology
EASG
BKIE
Healthcare
EASG
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
EASG
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
EASG
BKIE
Basic Materials
EASG
BKIE
Communication Services
EASG
BKIE
Utilities
EASG
BKIE
Energy
EASG
BKIE
Real Estate
EASG
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EASG vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
EASG
BKIE
EASG vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EASG | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.59 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 2.26 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.12 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 8.19 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EASG | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.59 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.59 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.93 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
EASG vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EASG | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -28.19% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -11.41% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.14% | -13.19% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.42% | -28.19% | -3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.45% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -4.98% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.95% | +0.22% |
Volatility
EASG vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.53%. This indicates that EASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EASG | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.53% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 12.14% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 14.57% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 16.12% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 16.34% | +2.01% |
EASG vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EASG vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than BKIE's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 3.84% | 4.18% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EASG and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EASG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to BKIE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.43% vs 7.13% for EASG. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for EASG.
EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 3.24% for BKIE.
EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.04% for BKIE.
BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EASG and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer