EAOM vs. THRV
EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOM is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAOM charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
EAOM vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
EAOM
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOM vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 5.08% | 1.85% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOM and THRV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOM vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
EAOM
THRV
EAOM vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOM | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOM | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.04 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
EAOM vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOM | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -1.50% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.51% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.44% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOM vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOM | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.44% | 2.92% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 2.92% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 2.92% | +4.99% |
EAOM vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOM vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.78% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOM and THRV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.78% for EAOM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for EAOM and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer