PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. MDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOM vs. MDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than MDIV's 7.68% return.


EAOM

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.36%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

MDIV

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.10%
YTD
7.68%
6M
7.38%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. MDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
5.08%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%6.39%10.30%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
7.68%3.77%10.05%11.50%-3.86%16.51%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and MDIV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.60

The correlation between EAOM and MDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EAOM vs. MDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOM
MDIV

Technology

30.2%

-

Financial Services

16.6%
22.4%

Industrials

11.0%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
3.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
1.6%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.0%

Energy

3.8%
17.6%

Basic Materials

2.8%
0.7%

Utilities

2.5%
9.6%

Real Estate

2.3%
21.6%

Technology

EAOM
30.2%
MDIV

-

Financial Services

EAOM
16.6%
MDIV
22.4%

Industrials

EAOM
11.0%
MDIV
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOM
9.5%
MDIV
3.2%

Healthcare

EAOM
8.6%
MDIV
1.6%

Communication Services

EAOM
8.3%
MDIV
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

EAOM
4.4%
MDIV
8.0%

Energy

EAOM
3.8%
MDIV
17.6%

Basic Materials

EAOM
2.8%
MDIV
0.7%

Utilities

EAOM
2.5%
MDIV
9.6%

Real Estate

EAOM
2.3%
MDIV
21.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. MDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIV
MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. MDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMMDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.27

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

9.10

+3.44

EAOM vs. MDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the MDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOM and MDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMMDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.65

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.52

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.34

+0.41

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. MDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum MDIV drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and MDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMMDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-48.50%

+27.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-3.39%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

-9.62%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

-13.02%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.14%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-4.58%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.22%

-0.05%

Volatility

EAOM vs. MDIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) at 1.62%. This indicates that EAOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOMMDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

1.62%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

4.32%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

6.71%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.07%

10.93%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

15.23%

-7.32%

EAOM vs. MDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIV's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOM vs. MDIV - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than MDIV's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.78%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
6.39%6.51%6.40%6.08%6.71%5.30%6.00%5.90%6.76%6.04%6.35%7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOM and MDIV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAOM has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to MDIV (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOM dropped -20.73% vs MDIV's -48.50%.

On 5-year performance, MDIV leads with 5.65% vs 4.28% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MDIV has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MDIV.

MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 2.78% for EAOM.

EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index, while MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.73% for MDIV.

EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOM and MDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer