EAOM vs. CTAP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP).

EAOM and CTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EAOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. CTAP is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

EAOM vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EAOM vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	-0.98%	0.50%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.36%	2.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 5.36% return.

EAOM

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 10.87%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: —

CTAP

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -5.40%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

EAOM

iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF

CTAP

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

EAOM vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 76
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOM	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOM	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.31	-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and CTAP is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EAOM vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than CTAP's 0.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.92%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOM	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.73%	-9.02%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-5.64%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-2.15%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EAOM	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.03%	22.12%	-14.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.02%	22.12%	-14.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.91%	22.12%	-14.21%