PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOM vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOM vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOM achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 21.95% return.


EAOM

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.36%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

CTAP

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
21.95%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOM vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EAOM and CTAP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.17

EAOM vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOM
CTAP

Technology

30.2%

-

Financial Services

16.6%
49.3%

Industrials

11.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Technology

EAOM
30.2%
CTAP

-

Financial Services

EAOM
16.6%
CTAP
49.3%

Industrials

EAOM
11.0%
CTAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

EAOM
9.5%
CTAP

-

Healthcare

EAOM
8.6%
CTAP

-

Communication Services

EAOM
8.3%
CTAP

-

Consumer Defensive

EAOM
4.4%
CTAP

-

Energy

EAOM
3.8%
CTAP

-

Basic Materials

EAOM
2.8%
CTAP

-

Utilities

EAOM
2.5%
CTAP

-

Real Estate

EAOM
2.3%
CTAP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOM vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOM vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOMCTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

EAOM vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOMCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

2.50

-1.74

Drawdowns

EAOM vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOM drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOM and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOMCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-9.02%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-4.47%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-2.18%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

Volatility

EAOM vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOMCTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

23.94%

-17.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.07%

23.94%

-15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

23.94%

-16.03%

EAOM vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOM vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

EAOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than CTAP's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.78%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOM and CTAP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOM.

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOM and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOM and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer