EAOK vs. EAOM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - EAOK tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index while EAOM tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOK returned 3.23%/yr vs 4.32%/yr for EAOM. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

EAOK vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's 5.30% return.

EAOK

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 4.24%
• 1Y: 11.91%
• 3Y*: 8.91%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

EAOM

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.55%
• 1Y: 14.38%
• 3Y*: 10.61%
• 5Y*: 4.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOK vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF	4.05%	11.47%	5.81%	10.13%	-14.92%	4.32%	8.01%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	5.30%	12.90%	7.29%	11.83%	-15.48%	6.39%	10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOK and EAOM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020	0.98

The correlation between EAOK and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOK vs. EAOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAOK	EAOM
Technology	10.2%	30.2%
Financial Services	4.8%	16.6%
Industrials	3.2%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	9.5%
Communication Services	2.6%	8.3%
Healthcare	2.4%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	4.4%
Energy	1.1%	3.8%
Basic Materials	0.8%	2.8%
Utilities	0.8%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.6%	2.3%

Return for Risk

EAOK vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOK

EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 66
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EAOM

EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOK vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOK	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.25	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.25	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.79	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.80	12.30	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAOK vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOK and EAOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOK	EAOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	2.25	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.54	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.76	-0.11

Drawdowns

EAOK vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, roughly equal to the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and EAOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOK	EAOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.91%	-20.73%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.43%	-5.17%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.08%	-7.63%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.91%	-20.73%	+0.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.24%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-4.96%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	1.17%	-0.16%

Volatility

EAOK vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 2.02%, while iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOK	EAOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	2.27%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.48%	5.24%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.49%	6.44%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.04%	8.06%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.82%	7.90%	-1.08%

EAOK vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EAOK and EAOM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EAOK vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than EAOM's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF	3.17%	3.18%	3.15%	2.80%	2.27%	1.19%	1.00%
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF	2.78%	2.89%	2.89%	2.70%	1.93%	1.32%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOK and EAOM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, EAOK and EAOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EAOK or EAOM?

EAOM has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to EAOK (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs EAOM's -20.73%.

Which ETF is better, EAOK or EAOM?

On 5-year performance, EAOM leads with 4.32% vs 3.23% for EAOK. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOK or EAOM?

Over the 5-year period, EAOM has performed better with a 4.32% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOK or EAOM?

EAOK and EAOM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOK or EAOM?

EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.78% for EAOM.

What is the main difference between EAOK and EAOM?

EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.