EAOK vs. MDAA
EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOK is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAOK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.
Performance
EAOK vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 22.13% return.
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- —
MDAA
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOK vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.85% | 1.17% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 22.13% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOK and MDAA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOK vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank
EAOK
MDAA
EAOK vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOK | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOK | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.47 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
EAOK vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and MDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOK | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -14.59% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.11% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -2.93% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOK vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOK | MDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 23.89% | -18.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 23.89% | -16.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 23.89% | -17.06% |
EAOK vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOK vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison
EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than MDAA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOK and MDAA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MDAA.
EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 0.97% for MDAA.
Find the right allocation for EAOK and MDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer