EAOK vs. EAOA
EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - EAOK tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index while EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOK returned 3.23%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for EAOA. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
EAOK vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 10.26% return.
EAOK
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOK vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 4.05% | 11.47% | 5.81% | 10.13% | -14.92% | 4.32% | 8.01% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 10.26% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOK and EAOA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EAOK and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
EAOK vs. EAOA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EAOK
EAOA
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EAOK
EAOA
Financial Services
EAOK
EAOA
Industrials
EAOK
EAOA
Consumer Cyclical
EAOK
EAOA
Communication Services
EAOK
EAOA
Healthcare
EAOK
EAOA
Consumer Defensive
EAOK
EAOA
Energy
EAOK
EAOA
Basic Materials
EAOK
EAOA
Utilities
EAOK
EAOA
Real Estate
EAOK
EAOA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOK vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
EAOK
EAOA
EAOK vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOK | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.99 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 13.28 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOK | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.28 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.93 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
EAOK vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and EAOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOK | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -25.06% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | -8.17% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.08% | -13.84% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | -25.06% | +5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.41% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -5.31% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.84% | -0.83% |
Volatility
EAOK vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 2.02%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOK | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 3.33% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.48% | 8.65% | -4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 10.75% | -5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 13.24% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.82% | 13.14% | -6.32% |
EAOK vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EAOK and EAOA have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAOK vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than EAOA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOK and EAOA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to EAOK (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs EAOA's -25.06%.
On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.58% vs 3.23% for EAOK. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOK and EAOA have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.
EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index.
EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOK and EAOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer