PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOK vs. EAOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOK vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 10.26% return.


EAOK

1D
0.19%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.24%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*

EAOA

1D
0.30%
1M
3.78%
YTD
10.26%
6M
10.73%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOK vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
4.05%11.47%5.81%10.13%-14.92%4.32%8.01%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
10.26%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOK and EAOA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.86

The correlation between EAOK and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOK vs. EAOA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOK
EAOA

Technology

10.2%
28.9%

Financial Services

4.8%
13.5%

Industrials

3.2%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
7.7%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.3%

Healthcare

2.4%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
3.7%

Energy

1.1%
3.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.4%

Utilities

0.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.6%

Technology

EAOK
10.2%
EAOA
28.9%

Financial Services

EAOK
4.8%
EAOA
13.5%

Industrials

EAOK
3.2%
EAOA
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOK
2.7%
EAOA
7.7%

Communication Services

EAOK
2.6%
EAOA
7.3%

Healthcare

EAOK
2.4%
EAOA
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

EAOK
1.3%
EAOA
3.7%

Energy

EAOK
1.1%
EAOA
3.0%

Basic Materials

EAOK
0.8%
EAOA
2.4%

Utilities

EAOK
0.8%
EAOA
2.3%

Real Estate

EAOK
0.6%
EAOA
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOK vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOK vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOKEAOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.99

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

13.28

-1.48

EAOK vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOK and EAOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOKEAOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.28

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.93

-0.28

Drawdowns

EAOK vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and EAOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOKEAOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-25.06%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-8.17%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.08%

-13.84%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

-25.06%

+5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.41%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-5.31%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.84%

-0.83%

Volatility

EAOK vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 2.02%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOKEAOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.33%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

8.65%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

10.75%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

13.24%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.82%

13.14%

-6.32%

EAOK vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EAOK and EAOA have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOK vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than EAOA's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
1.95%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.17%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOK and EAOA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to EAOK (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs EAOA's -25.06%.

On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.58% vs 3.23% for EAOK. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOK and EAOA have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index.

EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOK and EAOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer