PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOA vs. VASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOA vs. VASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EAOA having a 8.74% return and VASGX slightly lower at 8.44%.


EAOA

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
8.74%
6M
7.93%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*

VASGX

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
8.44%
6M
7.67%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOA vs. VASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
8.74%18.41%13.79%18.27%-17.76%14.52%19.79%
VASGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund
8.44%19.65%12.95%18.76%-17.21%14.35%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOA and VASGX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020

0.99

The correlation between EAOA and VASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOA vs. VASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA
EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VASGX
VASGX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. VASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAOAVASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.52

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.07

10.80

+0.27

EAOA vs. VASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the VASGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOA and VASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. VASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum VASGX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and VASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOAVASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-51.16%

+26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.17%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-12.89%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-24.43%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.19%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-7.24%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.90%

-0.01%

Volatility

EAOA vs. VASGX - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOAVASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.68%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

9.24%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

11.10%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

12.90%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

13.47%

-0.28%

EAOA vs. VASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VASGX's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOA vs. VASGX - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than VASGX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
1.97%2.10%2.09%2.21%1.93%1.48%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VASGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund
3.78%4.09%6.15%3.00%2.10%3.54%3.54%2.34%4.36%2.13%2.23%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EAOA and VASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VASGX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to EAOA (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs VASGX's -51.16%.

VASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOA and VASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer