EAOA vs. SLV
EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EAOA is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOA returned 8.15%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for SLV. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EAOA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EAOA vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -18.72% return.
EAOA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -24.90%
- YTD
- -18.72%
- 6M
- -19.72%
- 1Y
- 58.62%
- 3Y*
- 35.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.71%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
EAOA vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.74% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -18.72% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 50.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOA and SLV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOA vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EAOA
SLV
EAOA vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 1.16 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.07 | 2.63 | +8.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOA vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.06% | -76.28% | +51.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -50.97% | +42.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -50.97% | +37.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -50.97% | +25.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -50.42% | +48.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -44.66% | +39.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 22.37% | -20.48% |
Volatility
EAOA vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) is 4.52%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.50%. This indicates that EAOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOA | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 15.50% | -10.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 59.60% | -50.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 60.77% | -49.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 36.74% | -23.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 32.16% | -18.97% |
EAOA vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOA vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOA and SLV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to EAOA (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 16.71% vs 8.15% for EAOA. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOA has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EAOA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SLV is Silver. EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOA and 0.50% for SLV.
EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOA and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer