EAOA vs. RAAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. EAOA is passively managed, while RAAX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOA returned 8.58%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for RAAX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAOA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RAAX.

Performance

EAOA vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than RAAX's 18.87% return.

EAOA

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 24.34%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: —

RAAX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: 18.87%
• 6M: 18.93%
• 1Y: 36.89%
• 3Y*: 22.07%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOA vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	10.26%	18.41%	13.79%	18.27%	-17.76%	14.52%	19.79%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	18.87%	26.74%	12.50%	6.71%	1.51%	21.56%	22.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOA and RAAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between EAOA and RAAX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EAOA vs. RAAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAOA	RAAX
Technology	28.9%	1.7%
Financial Services	13.5%	0.0%
Industrials	9.0%	28.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	1.0%
Communication Services	7.3%	0.1%
Healthcare	6.8%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	0.5%
Energy	3.0%	32.6%
Basic Materials	2.4%	17.4%
Utilities	2.3%	13.0%
Real Estate	1.6%	5.0%

Return for Risk

EAOA vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 69
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 86
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOA vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAOA	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.73	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.54	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.50	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	5.60	-2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	20.79	-7.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAOA vs. RAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the RAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOA and RAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAOA	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.73	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.87	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.62	+0.31

Drawdowns

EAOA vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum RAAX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and RAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAOA	RAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.06%	-33.91%	+8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-6.62%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	-11.59%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.06%	-23.55%	-1.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-2.76%	+2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-6.78%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	1.78%	+0.06%

Volatility

EAOA vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 2.90%. This indicates that EAOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAOA	RAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	2.90%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	11.57%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	13.60%	-2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.24%	15.60%	-2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	15.75%	-2.61%

EAOA vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAOA vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison

EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than RAAX's 1.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.95%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	1.97%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAOA and RAAX in my portfolio?

EAOA and RAAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAOA or RAAX?

EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to RAAX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs RAAX's -33.91%.

Which ETF is better, EAOA or RAAX?

On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.48% vs 8.58% for EAOA. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAOA or RAAX?

Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAOA or RAAX?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAOA or RAAX?

RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

What is the main difference between EAOA and RAAX?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOA and 0.78% for RAAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.