EAOA vs. EAOK
EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) and EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index while EAOK tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOA returned 8.58%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for EAOK. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
EAOA vs. EAOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOA achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than EAOK's 4.05% return.
EAOA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOK
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA vs. EAOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 10.26% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 4.05% | 11.47% | 5.81% | 10.13% | -14.92% | 4.32% | 8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOA and EAOK is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EAOA and EAOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
EAOA vs. EAOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EAOA
EAOK
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EAOA
EAOK
Financial Services
EAOA
EAOK
Industrials
EAOA
EAOK
Consumer Cyclical
EAOA
EAOK
Communication Services
EAOA
EAOK
Healthcare
EAOA
EAOK
Consumer Defensive
EAOA
EAOK
Energy
EAOA
EAOK
Basic Materials
EAOA
EAOK
Utilities
EAOA
EAOK
Real Estate
EAOA
EAOK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOA vs. EAOK — Risk / Return Rank
EAOA
EAOK
EAOA vs. EAOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) and iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOA | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 2.70 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 11.80 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOA | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.19 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.46 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
EAOA vs. EAOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOA drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, which is greater than EAOK's maximum drawdown of -19.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOA and EAOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOA | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.06% | -19.91% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -4.43% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -7.08% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -19.91% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.20% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -5.02% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.01% | +0.83% |
Volatility
EAOA vs. EAOK - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) at 2.02%. This indicates that EAOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOA | EAOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.02% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 4.48% | +4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 5.49% | +5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 7.04% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 6.82% | +6.32% |
EAOA vs. EAOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EAOA and EAOK have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAOA vs. EAOK - Dividend Comparison
EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EAOK's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOA and EAOK have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to EAOK (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOA dropped -25.06% vs EAOK's -19.91%.
On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.58% vs 3.23% for EAOK. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOA and EAOK have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.
EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index, while EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index.
EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOA and EAOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer