EADIX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
EADIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 29, 2003. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADIX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund | -6.50% | 23.11% | 8.75% | 25.02% | -18.77% | 23.18% | 14.32% | 28.50% | -11.44% | 20.02% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EADIX achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EADIX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
EADIX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EADIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EADIX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
EADIX
FGIAX
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EADIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.75 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.26 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.61 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 12.12 | -7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EADIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.75 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.80 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.58 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EADIX and FGIAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
EADIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADIX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund | 3.95% | 3.38% | 4.15% | 3.97% | 5.42% | 6.52% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.95% | 3.09% | 3.92% | 3.84% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EADIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADIX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EADIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -49.35% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -8.29% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.71% | -21.08% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.34% | -38.02% | +2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -3.78% | -7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -7.22% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.78% | +1.03% |
Volatility
EADIX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that EADIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EADIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 4.05% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 7.09% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 12.28% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 13.08% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 15.17% | +2.42% |