EADIX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
EADIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 29, 2003. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
EADIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EADIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADIX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund | -6.50% | 23.11% | 8.75% | 25.02% | -18.77% | 23.18% | 14.32% | 28.50% | -11.44% | 20.02% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EADIX achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EADIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
EADIX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 15.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EADIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EADIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EADIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
EADIX
FASGX
EADIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EADIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.21 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.73 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.55 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 6.89 | -2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EADIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.21 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.70 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between EADIX and FASGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EADIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
EADIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADIX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund | 3.95% | 3.38% | 4.15% | 3.97% | 5.42% | 6.52% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.95% | 3.09% | 3.92% | 3.84% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
EADIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EADIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADIX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EADIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -47.35% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -9.07% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.71% | -23.54% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.34% | -27.20% | -8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -7.95% | -3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -6.74% | -1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.04% | +0.77% |
Volatility
EADIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund (EADIX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that EADIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EADIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 4.57% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 7.78% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 12.82% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 12.14% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 12.56% | +5.03% |