PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DZZ vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DZZ vs. DBAW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while DBAW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DZZ returned -10.52%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for DBAW. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.

Performance

DZZ vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -48.31% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DZZ has underperformed DBAW with an annualized return of -10.52%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.

DZZ

1D
1.45%
1M
-16.65%
YTD
-48.31%
6M
-41.62%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
-6.90%
5Y*
-4.82%
10Y*
-10.52%

DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DZZ vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes		-48.31%132.78%-35.06%-8.14%2.79%0.56%-37.13%-26.64%8.21%-21.81%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF		16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DZZ and DBAW is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2014

0.03

The correlation between DZZ and DBAW shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes

Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF

Often compared with DZZ:
DZZ vs. UGLDZZ vs. GLDDZZ vs. GLLDZZ vs. VOODZZ vs. MULLDZZ vs. TERGDZZ vs. COPJ
Often compared with DBAW:
DBAW vs. HAWXDBAW vs. HFXIDBAW vs. GSIEDBAW vs. MDIJXDBAW vs. BROIXDBAW vs. BKIEDBAW vs. DXJ

Return for Risk

DZZ vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DZZ
DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DZZ vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DZZDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.07
2.86

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.69
3.90

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.55

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

4.09

-3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

16.97

-16.76

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DZZ vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DZZ and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DZZDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

2.86

-2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.83

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.75

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.63

-0.86

Drawdowns

DZZ vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and DBAW.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DZZDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.64%

-31.44%

-65.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.84%

-9.00%

-71.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.84%

-14.11%

-66.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.84%

-17.87%

-62.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.84%

-31.44%

-49.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.16%

-0.51%

-94.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-5.00%

-77.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.19%

2.16%

+51.03%

Volatility

DZZ vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a higher volatility of 30.21% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that DZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DZZDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.21%

4.71%

+25.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.65%

11.00%

+48.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

169.45%

12.88%

+156.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.63%

13.74%

+69.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.05%

15.28%

+48.77%

DZZ vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

DZZ vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF		3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

DZZ and DBAW have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DZZ has higher volatility (30.21%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DZZ dropped -96.64% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 10-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.44% vs -10.52% for DZZ. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.44% return vs -10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DZZ.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.

DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while DBAW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DZZ and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer