DZZ vs. ASHS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS).

DZZ and ASHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DZZ is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. Both DZZ and ASHS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DZZ vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DZZ vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	-31.51%	132.78%	-35.06%	-8.14%	2.79%	0.56%	-37.13%	-26.64%	8.21%	-21.81%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	4.66%	39.48%	2.68%	-10.03%	-24.78%	17.66%	28.22%	24.53%	-35.91%	7.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -31.51% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, DZZ has underperformed ASHS with an annualized return of -8.65%, while ASHS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.07% annualized return.

DZZ

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: -31.51%
• 6M: 72.00%
• 1Y: 61.35%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: -3.31%
• 10Y*: -8.65%

ASHS

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -11.46%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 40.76%
• 3Y*: 7.63%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 2.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DZZ vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

DZZ

DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes

ASHS

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF

Return for Risk

DZZ vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DZZ

DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 49
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 85
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DZZ vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DZZ	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.70	-1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.16	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	2.85	-2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.46	10.16	-8.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DZZ vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DZZ and ASHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DZZ	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	1.70	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.15	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.14	0.08	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.17	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between DZZ and ASHS is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

DZZ vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

Neither DZZ nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%

Drawdowns

DZZ vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than ASHS's maximum drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DZZ	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.64%	-69.90%	-26.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.95%	-14.03%	-60.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.95%	-47.81%	-27.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.59%	-47.81%	-32.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.59%	-39.59%	-54.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.19%	-48.78%	-33.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.32%	3.93%	+39.39%

Volatility

DZZ vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a higher volatility of 15.61% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) at 8.57%. This indicates that DZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DZZ	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.61%	8.57%	+7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	126.04%	16.21%	+109.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	168.01%	24.04%	+143.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.53%	26.08%	+56.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.37%	25.64%	+37.73%