DYNF vs. GLTR
DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. DYNF is actively managed, while GLTR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.62%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
DYNF vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
DYNF vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 9.88% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.75% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and GLTR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
GLTR
DYNF vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DYNF | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.22 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 1.17 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.77 | 2.88 | +11.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -55.70% | +20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -34.09% | +25.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -34.09% | +15.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -34.09% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -31.27% | +29.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -28.82% | +22.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 13.86% | -12.01% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is 4.91%, while abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 10.43% | -5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 36.24% | -25.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 38.40% | -25.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 23.87% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 20.64% | -0.73% |
DYNF vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNF vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and GLTR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to DYNF (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.62% vs 14.04% for GLTR. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLTR is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.60% for GLTR.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer